VolRC RAS scientific journal (online edition)
RuEn

Journal section "Socio-economic research"

Interaction Configuration of St. Petersburg Social Movements Organizations Aimed at Improving the Urban Environment Quality

Tykanova E.V., Khokhlova A.M.

5 (22), 2019

Tykanova E.V., Khokhlova A.M. Interaction Configuration of St. Petersburg Social Movements Organizations Aimed at Improving the Urban Environment Quality. Social area, 2019, no. 5 (22). URL: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/28395?_lang=en DOI: 10.15838/sa.2019.5.22.7

DOI: 10.15838/sa.2019.5.22.7

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Axenov K., Brade I., Bondarchuk E. Transformation of Urban Space in Post-Soviet Russia. London: Routledge, 2006. 196 p.
  2. Golubchikov O. World-city entrepreneurialism: globalist imaginaries, neoliberal geographies, and the production of new St. Petersburg. Environment and Planning, 2010, no. 42 (3), pp. 626–643.
  3. Golubchikov O., Badyina A. Conquering the inner-city: Urban redevelopment and gentrification in Moscow. The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy. Tsenkova S., Nedović-Budić Z. (eds.). Heidelberg, New York: Physica-Verlag, 2006. P. 195–212.
  4. Vorobyev D., Campbell T. Anti-viruses and underground monuments: resisting catastrophic urbanism in Saint Petersburg. Mute, 2008, no. 2 (8), pp. 76–97.
  5. Harvi D. Socialnaya spravedlivost i gorod. M.: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2018. 440 s.
  6. Kleman K., Miryasova O., Demidov A. Ot obyvateley k aktivistam: zarozhdayuschiesya socialnye dvizheniya v sovremennoy Rossii. M.: Tri kvadrata, 2010. 680 c.
  7. Zakirova M. «Vot zdes vidno vse!»: samoreprezentaciya gorodskogo obschestvennogo dvizheniya // Zhurn. issled. social. politiki. 2008. T. 2. S. 217–240.
  8. Gladarev B. Istoriko-kulturnoe nasledie Peterburga: rozhdenie obschestvennosti iz duha goroda // Ot obschestvennogo k publichnomu / pod red. O. Harhordina. SPb.: Izd-vo EUSPb, 2011. S. 71–304.
  9. Rublev D.I. Opyt grazhdanskoy samoorganizacii: dvizhenie protiv uplotnitelnoy zastroyki v Moskve, 2007–2008 gg. // Rossiya i sovremennyy mir. 2014. № 2. S. 238–248.
  10. Zuykina A.S. Faktory uspeha i «provala» v deyatelnosti lokalnyh soobschestv v situaciyah osparivaniya gorodskogo prostranstva (na primere goroda Permi) // Istoriya permskogo gorodskogo samoupravleniya v XVIII–XXI vv.: genezis, razvitie, transformaciya. Perm: Novoprint, 2017. S. 85–94.
  11. Zverev A.A. Politicheskoe izmerenie ohrany pamyatnikov v Rossii: keys moskovskogo dvizheniya Arhnadzor // Vestn. Ros. un-ta druzhby narodov. Ser.: Politologiya. 2017. № 19 (2). S. 118–129.
  12. Moskaleva S.M., Tykanova E.V. Socialnye usloviya deyatelnosti grazhdanskih i ekspertnyh grupp po uluchsheniyu kachestva gorodskoy sredy // Zhurn. sociologii i social. antropologii. 2016. T. 19. № 4. S. 103–120.
  13. Tykanova E., Khokhlova A. Grassroots urban protests in St. Petersburg: (non)participation in decision-making on the futures of city territories. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 2019, pp. 1–22.
  14. Gamson W.A. The strategy of social protest. Homewood: Dorsey, 1975. 217 p.
  15. Kriesi H. [et al.]. New social movements in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. London: Routledge, 2015. 338 p.
  16. Kriesi H. The organizational structure of new social movements in a political context. Comparative perspectives on social movements. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996. P. 152–184.
  17. McCarthy J.D., Zald M.N. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American journal of sociology, 1977, iss. 82, no. 6, pp. 1212–1241.
  18. Edwards B., McCarthy J.D. Resources and social movement mobilization. The Blackwell companion to social movements. Snow D.A. (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004. P. 116–152.
  19. Kriesi H. The Political Opportunity Structure of New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization. The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements. Jenkins J.C., Klandermans B. (eds.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995. P. 167–198.
  20. McAdam D. [et al.]. Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 426 p.
  21. Tilly Ch. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading «Social Movements and National Politics». Statemaking and Social Movements. Bright Ch., Harding S. (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1978. P. 297–317.
  22. Tarrow S.G. Struggling to reform: Social movements and policy change during cycles of protest. Ithaca: Center for International Studies, Cornell University, 1983. 67 p.
  23. Jenkins J.C., Klandermans B. (eds.). The politics of social protest: Comparative perspectives on states and social movements. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995. 278 p.
  24. Goldstone J.A. Introduction: Bridging institutionalized and noninstitutionalized politics. States, parties, and social movements. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. P. 1–24.
  25. Shevcova I.K., Bederson V.D. «U vlasti tochka zreniya – molchanie»: vzaimodeystvie iniciativnyh grupp i organov mestnoy vlasti v politike gorodskogo planirovaniya // Politicheskaya nauka. 2017. № 4. S. 111–136.
  26. Kolba A.I., Ilchenko A.A. Modeli politicheskoy kommunikacii v konflikte mezhdu strukturami vlasti i obschestvom (regionalnyy uroven) // Chelovek. Obschestvo. Upravlenie. 2012. № 1. S. 122–132.
  27. Kolba A.I. Modeli politicheskoy kommunikacii v konflikte mezhdu strukturami vlasti i obschestvom (regionalnyy uroven) // Sovremennyy gorod: vlast, upravlenie, ekonomika. 2016. № 1. S. 22–31.
  28. Koroleva M.N., Chernova M.A. Taktiki realizacii gorodskih proektov v usloviyah sovremennyh upravlencheskih praktik i zakonodatelstva // Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki. 2017. T. 2. № 3. S. 28–41.
  29. Koroleva M.N., Chernova M.A. Gorodskoy aktivizm: upravlencheskie praktiki kak resurs i barer razvitiya gorodskih proektov // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2018. T. 9. № 9. S. 93–101.
  30. Goldstone J.A. More social movements or fewer? Beyond political opportunity structures to relational fields. Theory and society, 2004, vol. 33, no. 3–4, pp. 333–365.

-->