VolRC RAS scientific journal (online edition)
28.04.202504.2025с 01.01.2025
Page views
Visitors
* - daily average in the current month
RuEn

Journal section "Socio-demographic research"

Experience of Using the Semantic Differential Method for Diagnostics of Marital Cohesion in Families with Different Number of Children

Karpova V.M., Antonov A.I., Denisova A.V.

Volume 10, Issue 2, 2024

Karpova V.M., Antonov A.I., Denisova A.V. (2024). Experience of Using the Semantic Differential Method for Diagnostics of Marital Cohesion in Families with Different Number of Children. Social area, 10 (2). DOI: 10.15838/sa.2024.2.42.6 URL: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/30018?_lang=en

DOI: 10.15838/sa.2024.2.42.6

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Alexandrova O.V., Dermanova I.B. (2018). Semantic differential of a life situation. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya=Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 26(3), 127–145. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2018260307 (in Russian).
  2. Ananeva N.N. (2015). Subculture of large families in modern society. Bulletin of Slavic Cultures, 3(37), 99–104. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/subkultura-mnogodetnoy-semi-v-sovremennom-obschestve (in Russian).
  3. Andreeva T.V. (2009). Socio-psychological problems of stability and success of marital and family relations. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 1-1. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialno-psihologicheskie-problemy-stabilnosti-i-uspeshnosti-brachno-semeynyh-otnosheniy (in Russian).
  4. Antonov A.I. (1975) Measuring the similarity of spouses' ideas about each other's family roles. In: Teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy psihologii poznaniya lyud'mi drug druga [Theoretical and Applied Problems of Psychology of People's Cognition of Each Other]. Krasnodar.
  5. Antonov A.I., Karpova V.M., Lyalikova S.V. et al. (2022). I vmeste, i vroz': sotsiologiya vzaimnykh predstavlenii suprugov (po rezul'tatam sotsiologicheskikh issledovanii) [Both Together and Apart: The Sociology of Mutual Representations of Spouses (Based on the Results of Sociological Research)]. Moscow: U Nikitskikh vorot.
  6. Antonov A.I., Karpova V.M., Lyalikova S.V., Novoselova E.N., Sinel'nikov A.B. (2020). Tsennosti semeino-detnogo obraza zhizni (SeDOZh–2019): analit. otchet po rezul'tatam mezhregional'nogo sotsiologo-demograficheskogo issledovaniya [The family-child lifestyle values (SeDOJ–2019): an analytical report on the results of an interregional sociological and demographic study: Moscow, MSU, Faculty of Sociology]. Moscow: MAKS Press.
  7. Antonov A.I., Sinel'nikov A.B., Novoselova E.N. et al. (2009). Familisticheskie issledovaniya. T. 2. Million mnenii o sem'e i o sebe [Family Studies. Vol. 2. A Million Opinions about Family and about Oneself]. Moscow: Knizhnyi dom “Universitet” (KDU).
  8. Bagirova A.P., Yan D. (2023). Grandparental labor: risk assessment of unclaimed/overloaded Ural grandparents. Social Policy and Sociology, 22(1)(146), 14–22 (in Russian).
  9. Baranova T.S. (1994) Psychosemantic methods in sociology. Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling, 3-4, 55–64 (in Russian).
  10. Drobysheva T.V., Voytenko M.Yu. (2022). Peculiarities of joint pastime of parents with their children in the megalopolis. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 11(3)(43), 232–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2022-11-3-232-242 (in Russian).
  11. Emeliyanov N., Zabaev I., Pavlenko E., Pavlyutkin I. (2011). Sem'ya i detorozhdenie v Rossii. Kategorii roditel'skogo soznaniya [Family and Childbearing in Russia. Categories of Parental Mind]. Moscow: PSTGU.
  12. Frejka T., Sobotka T., Home J.M., Toulemon L. (Eds.) (2008). Summary and general conclusions. Childbearing trends and policies in Europe. Demographic Research, 19(2), 5–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.2
  13. Goldscheider F., Bernhardt E., Branden M. (2013). Domestic gender equality and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research, 29, 1097–1126. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.40
  14. Heise D.R. (1969). Some methodological issues in semantic differential research. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 406–422.
  15. Ildarhanova Ch.I., Ershova G.N., Ershova Yu.N., Ibragimova A.A. (2022). Economic factors of increasing fertility in the Volga Federal District: a retrospective analysis (2000–2020). MIR (Modernizatsiia. Innovatsii. Razvitie)=MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research), 13(2), 288–303 (in Russian).
  16. Karpova V.M. (2020) Specifics of using the semantic differential method for studying reproductive attitudes. In: Strategic Tasks of Demographic Development: Priorities and Regional Features. Tenth Valenteev Readings: Collection of Reports. Moscow: Ekon. f-t MGU.
  17. Köppe S., Curran M., Aldama I. (2024). How large families fare in Germany: Examining child poverty risks and policy solutions. International Journal of Social Welfare, 1–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12639
  18. Korolenko A.V. (2021) The time resource of the modern family: The experience of studying on the example of the Vologda Oblast. Economy. Sociology. Right, 4(24). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vremennoy-resurs-sovremennoy-semi-opyt-izucheniya-na-primere-vologodskoy-oblasti (in Russian).
  19. Kuchmaeva O.V., Kuchmaev M.G., Petryakova O.L. (2009) Transformation of the family institution and family values. Bulletin of Slavic Cultures, 3, 29 (in Russian).
  20. Lehmann J.-Y.K., Nuevo-Chiquero A., Vidal-Fernandez M. (2018). The early origins of birth order differences in children’s outcomes and parental behavior. Journal of Human Resources, 53, 1, 123–156.
  21. Lupenko N.N., Stanoeva Yu.P. (2022). Value orientations and marital satisfaction in young families. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, 77-4. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsennostnye-orientatsii-i-udovletvoryonnost-brakom-u-molodyh-semey (in Russian).
  22. Lyalikova S.V. (2019). Concept of the family life cycle and the features of its typologization in the works of domestic scientists with the use of research data. Sociology, 6, 233–248. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-zhiznennogo-tsikla-semi-i-osobennosti-ego-tipologizatsii-v-rabotah-otechestvennyh-uchenyh-s-privlecheniem-issledovatelskih (in Russian).
  23. Mattson R.E., Rogge R.D., Johnson M.D., Davidson E.K.B., Fincham F.D. (2013). The positive and negative semantic dimensions of relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 20(2), 328–355. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01412.x
  24. Novikov A.L., Novikova I.A. (2011). Semantic differential: Theory and practical applications in linguistic and psychological research. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metod-semanticheskogo-differentsiala-teoreticheskie-osnovy-i-praktika-primeneniya-v-lingvisticheskih-i-psihologicheskih (in Russian).
  25. Obozov N.N., Timoshenko E.Ju. (2008). Psychological factors of family interpersonal attitudes control. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 3, 6–22. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psihologicheskie-faktory-regulyatsii-mezhlichnostnyh-otnosheniy-v-semie (in Russian).
  26. Osgood C.E., Suci G.J., Tannenbaum P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, Chicago and London: University of Illinois Press.
  27. Pavlov O.Yu. (2012). Brand management: Deep semantic differential of brand. Creative Economy, 9. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/brend-menedzhment-glubinnyy-semanticheskiy-differentsial-brenda (in Russian).
  28. Ploder A., Eder A. (2015). Semantic differential. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.03231-1
  29. Rostovskaya T.K., Zolotareva O.A. (2022). Demographic stability as a priority of the RF demographic policy. Management Issues, 3, 6–18. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2022-3-6-18 (in Russian).
  30. Shields L. (2007). Using semantic differentials in fieldwork. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 13(1), 116–119. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00666.x
  31. Sinelnikov A.B., Karpova V.M., Lyalikova S.V., Antonov A.I. (2023) The influence of reproductive experience of parental families on the probability of choosing a parenting strategy for large families. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve, 4, 71–85. DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2023.4.6 (in Russian).
  32. Sudin S.A., Kutyavina Е.Е., Kuramshev A.V. (2018). Intergenerational relations in modern families in the region of Nizhny Novgorod. PNRPU sociology and economics bulletin, 3, 56–71 (in Russian).
  33. Sychev O.A. (2016). Marital attributions as a factor of relationship satisfaction among pairs with different duration of marriage. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 59, 172–187. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/59/11 (in Russian).
  34. Tuarmensky V.V., Tuarmenskaya A.V., Kareeva I.V. (2022). Intercultural communication and students' stereotyped images of a typical American. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics 5, 44–49. DOI: 10.24158/spp.2022.5.5 (in Russian).
  35. Yanitskiy M.S., Seriy A.V., Prokonich O.A. Peculiarities of personality temporal perspective among representatives of different value types of mass consciousness. Journal Collection of Scientific Works of KRASEC. Section “The Humanities”, 2(20), 175–180 (in Russian).

View full article