VolRC RAS scientific journal (online edition)
RuEn

Journal section "Socio-economic research"

City Management in Russia: Conditions for Effective Work

Dyatlov A.V., Kovalev V.V., Ponamarev A.B.

5 (22), 2019

Dyatlov A.V., Kovalev V.V., Ponamarev A.B. City Management in Russia: Conditions for Effective Work. Social area, 2019, no. 5 (22). URL: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/28391?_lang=en DOI: 10.15838/sa.2019.5.22.3

DOI: 10.15838/sa.2019.5.22.3

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Shmelev A.A. Razvitie instituta siti-menedzhera v sovremennoy Rossii: problemy opredeleniya statusa // Novoe slovo v nauke i praktike. 2014. № 10. S. 21–22.
  2. Neustroev A.N. Siti-menedzher kak glavnoe zveno mestnogo samoupravleniya // Problemy sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. № 31. S. 87–90.
  3. Vydrin I.V. Siti-menedzhery v sisteme upravleniya municipalnymi obrazovaniyami // Vestn. Ural. In-ta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava. 2011. № 2. S. 67–73.
  4. Vasilev V.I. Borba s korrupciey i mestnoe samoupravlenie // Zhurn. ros. prava. 2012. № 4. S. 5–17.
  5. Akopov L.V. Ot vybornogo glavy administracii k «siti-menedzheru» – utrachennaya legitimnost // Severo-Kavkaz. yurid. vestn. 2015. № 3. S. 132–134.
  6. Avdonin V.S. Transformaciya instituta siti-menedzhera v Ryazani na fone reformy MSU // Pro Nunc. Sovremennye politicheskie processy. 2015. № 1. S. 99–120.
  7. K voprosu o vvedenii instituta siti-menedzhera v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Ochakovskiy V.A. [i dr.] // Nauch. zhurn. KubGAU. 2015. № 11. S. 1–12.
  8. Bzegezheva L.K. Problema naznacheniya glavy administracii na kontraktnoy osnove // Vestn. Maykop. gos. tehnol. un-ta. 2016. № 1. S. 85–90.
  9. Shmelev A.A. Razvitie instituta siti-menedzhera v sovremennoy Rossii: problemy opredeleniya statusa // Novoe slovo v nauke i praktike. 2014. № 10. S. 180–182.
  10. Kandrina N.A. Modeli organizacii municipalnogo upravleniya: glava municipalnogo obrazovaniya i siti-menedzher // Vestn. Altaysk. akad. ekonomiki i prava. 2011. № 3. S. 39–43.
  11. Lasko A.I. Kto dolzhen upravlyat gorodom: mer ili siti-menedzher? // Politika, gosudarstvo i pravo. 2014. № 7. URL: http://politika.snauka.ru/2014/07/1751 (data obrascheniya 07.04.2019).
  12. Kasatkin V.M. Institut siti-menedzhmenta i perspektivy ego razvitiya v Rossii. URL: http://docplayer.ru/54972164-Udk-v-m-kasatkin-institut-siti-menedzhmenta-i-perspektivy-ego-razvitiya-v-rossii.html
  13. Frant H. High-Powered and Low-Powered Incentives in the Public Sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1996, no. 6 (3), p. 85.
  14. Alford R.R., Eugene C.L. Voting Turnout in American Cities. American Political Science Review, 1968, no. 62 (3), pp. 796–813.
  15. Tambovcev V.L. Ponyatie socialno-ekonomicheskogo genotipa i sovremennye issledovaniya v sfere menedzhmenta // Ros. zhurn. menedzhmenta. 2014. № 2. S. 117–132.
  16. Neustroev A.N. Institut «siti-menedzhera» v RF: za i protiv // European Science. 2015. № 5 (6). S. 28–31.
  17. Petnem R. Chtoby demokratiya srabotala. M.: Ad Marginem, 1996. 288 s.
  18. Ochakovskiy V.A. K voprosu o vvedenii instituta siti-menedzhera v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Nauch. zhurn. KubGAU. 2015. № 11. S. 3–5.
  19. Feiock R.C., Steinacker A., Park H.J. Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures. Public Administration Review, 2009, № 69 (2). S. 256–270.
  20. Miheev A.A., Shutnikova E.A. Socialnye problemy urbanizacii i siti-menedzhment na etape postmoderna // Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. 2015. № 2 (35). S. 73–78.

-->