VolRC RAS scientific journal (online edition)
18.01.202201.2022с 01.01.2022
Page views
Visitors
* - daily average in the current month
RuEn

Journal section "Socio-humanitarian research"

On the Issue of the Alternative Ways of Evaluating Scientific Results

Artamonova A.S., Tret’yakova O.V.

Volume 6, Issue 5, 2020

Artamonova A.S., Tretyakova O.V. On the Issue of the Alternative Ways of Evaluating Scientific Results. Social area, 2020, vol. 6, no. 5. DOI: 10.15838/sa.2020.5.27.7 URL: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/28771?_lang=en

DOI: 10.15838/sa.2020.5.27.7

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Bell S., Shaw B., Boaz A. Real-world approaches to assessing the impact of environmental research on policy. Research Evaluation, 2011, no. 20 (3), pp. 227–237.
  2. Bornmann L. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, no. 64 (2), pp. 217–233. DOI: 10.1002/asi.22803
  3. Van der Meulen B., Rip A. Evaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands. Research Evaluation, 2000, no. 9 (1), pp. 11–25.
  4. Tretyakova O.V., Kabakova E.A. Vozmozhnosti i perspektivy ispolzovaniya indeksov citirovaniya v ocenke rezultatov deyatelnosti nauchnogo uchrezhdeniya // Ekonomicheskie i socialnye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. 2013. № 6 (30). S. 189–200.
  5. Moskaleva O.V. Nauchnye publikacii kak sredstvo kommunikacii, analiza i ocenki nauchnoy deyatelnosti // Rukovodstvo po naukometrii: indikatory razvitiya nauki i tehnologii. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 2014. S. 110–163. DOI: 10.15826/B978-5-7996-1352-5.0006
  6. Priem J., Groth P., Taraborelli D. The altmetrics collection. PLoS ONE, 2012, no. 7 (11): e48753. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048753
  7. Thelwall M., Haustein S., Lariviere V., Sugimoto C.R. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE, 2013, no. 8 (5): e64841. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
  8. Kousha K., Thelwall M., Rezaie S. Using the Web for research evaluation: The Integrated Online Impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, no. 4 (1), pp. 124–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.003
  9. Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2011, vol. 13, no. 4: e123. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e123
  10. Barnes C. The Use of altmetrics as a tool for measuring research impact. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 2015, no. 46 (2), pp. 121–134. DOI: 10.1080/00048623.2014.1003174
  11. Pokazatel altmetriki kak odin iz indikatorov nauchnogo vliyaniya publikacii / V.A. Markusova [i dr.] // Vestn. Ros. akad. nauk. 2018. T. 88. № 9. C. 811–818.
  12. Kasavina N.A. Nauka v sovremennom rossiyskom obschestve. Analiticheskiy obzor // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2014. T. XLII. № 4. S. 77–91.
  13. Sadovnichiy V.A. Strategicheskie voprosy razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. Nauchnye problemy nacionalnoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federacii. Vyp. 4. M., 2004.
  14. Rull V. The most important application of science. EMBO Reports, 2014, no. 15 (9), pp. 919–922. DOI: 10.15252/embr.201438848
  15. Nalimov V.V., Mulchenko Z.M. Naukometriya: monografiya. M.: Nauka, 1969. 192 s.
  16. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 2006, no. 295 (1), pp. 90–93. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.1.90
  17. Vahrushev M.V. Altmetriki, vebometriki i informetriki kak vzaimodopolnyayuschie napravleniya v sovremennoy bibliometrii // Nauch. i tehnich. b-ki. 2019. № 8. S. 67–76. DOI: 10.33186/1027-3689-2019-8-67-76
  18. Rossner M., Van Epps H., Hill E. Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology, 2007, no. 179 (6), pp. 1091–1092. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200711140
  19. PLoS Editors. The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Medicine, 2006, no. 3 (6): e291. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291
  20. De Solla Price D.J., Beaver D. Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist, 1966, no. 21, pp. 1011–1018.
  21. Smith R. Measuring the social impact of research. BMJ, 2001, no. 323 (7312): 528.
  22. Osipov G.V., Klimovickiy S.V. K razrabotke kachestvennyh metodov ocenki rezultatov nauchnoy deyatelnosti // Socialno-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2017. № 5. S. 76–88.
  23. Niederkrotenthaler T., Dorner T.E., Maier M. Development of a practical tool to measure the impact of publications on the society based on focus group discussions with scientists. BMC Public Health, 2011, no. 11: 588. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-588
  24. Galletta D., Bjørn‐Andersen N., Markus M.L., Straub D., Leidner D.E., McLean E.R., Wetherbe J. If practice makes perfect, where do we stand? Communications of the AIS, 2019, no. 45 (3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04503
  25. Busygina T.V. Altmetriya kak kompleks novyh instrumentov dlya ocenki produktov nauchnoy deyatelnosti // Idei i idealy. 2016. T. 2. № 2 (28). S. 79–87.
  26. Guba K. Bolshie dannye v sociologii: novye dannye, novaya sociologiya? Sociologicheskoe obozrenie. 2018. T. 17. № 1. S. 213–237. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2018-1-213-236
  27. Thelwall M. Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences. In: Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services. San Francisco, USA: Morgan and Claypool Publishers, 2009.
  28. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: Framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2009, no. 11 (1). DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1157
  29. Goncharov M.V., Kolosov K.A. Ispolzovanie statisticheskih dannyh veb-serverov bibliotek dlya vychisleniya altmetrik // Nauch. i tehnich. b-ki. 2019. № 12. S. 25–33. DOI: 10.33186/1027-3689-2019-12-25-33
  30. Vaughan L. Web link counts correlate with ISI impact factors: Evidence from two disciplines. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005, no. 39: 436. DOI: 10.1002/meet.1450390148
  31. Vaughan L., Shaw D. Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003, no. 54 (14), pp. 1313–322. DOI: 10.1002/asi.10338
  32. Vaughan L., Shaw D. Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005, no. 56 (10), pp. 1075–1087. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20199
  33. Saeed-Ul Hassan, Sehrish Iqbal, Naif R. Aljohani, Salem Alelyani, Alesia Zuccala. Introducing the “alt-index” for measuring the social visibility of scientific research. Scientometrics, 2020, no. 123, pp. 1407–1419. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03447-z
  34. Holmberg K., Bowman S., Bowman T., Didegah F., Kortelainen T. What is societal impact and where do altmetrics fit into the equation? Journal of Altmetrics, 2019, no. 2 (1). DOI: http://doi.org/10.29024/joa.21
  35. Marx W., Bornmann L. On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in Web of Science. Scientometrics, 2015, no. 102, pp. 1823–1827. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1499-9
  36. Mazov N.A., Gureev V.N. Alternativnye podhody k ocenke nauchnyh rezultatov // Vestn. Ros. akad. nauk. 2015. T. 85. № 2. S. 115–122.
  37. Yurevich M.A., Capenko I.P. Perspektivy primeneniya altmetriki v sociogumanitarnyh naukah // Inform. obsch-vo. 2015. № 4. S. 9–16.
  38. Chavda J., Patel A. Measuring research impact: Bibliometrics, social media, altmetrics, and the BJGP. British Journal of General Practice, 2016. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X683353
  39. Osterrieder A. The value and use of social media as communication tool in the plant sciences. Plant Methods, 2013, no. 9 (1): 26.