VolRC RAS scientific journal (online edition)

Journal section "Socio-economic research"

The Concept of Digital Socio-Adaptive Participation in the Study of Digitalization of Social Services

Gasumovaс S.Е., Starshinova A.V.

Volume 8, Issue 2, 2022

Gasumova S.E., Starshinova A.V. The Concept of Digital Socio-Adaptive Participation in the Study of Digitalization of Social Services. Social area, 8(2). DOI: 10.15838/sa.2022.2.34.3 URL: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/29291?_lang=en

DOI: 10.15838/sa.2022.2.34.3

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Borodkina O., Sibirev V. (2021). The digital capital of social services consumers: Factors of influence and the need for investment. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 19(1), 129–142. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2021-19-1-129-142
  2. Bourdieu P. (2002). Forms of capital. In: Zapadnaya ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Western Economic Sociology], 3(5) (in Russian).
  3. Chugunov A.V. (2017). Cooperation of citizen with the authority as a feedback channel in e-participation: Institutionalization issues. Vlast’, 25(10), 59–66 (in Russian).
  4. Chugunov A.V., Panfilov G.O. (2021). Methodology for assessing regional e-participation systems in the context of socio-economic development of the subjects of the Russian Federation. In: Sovremennoe gosudarstvennoe upravlenie: obrazovanie, nauka, praktika: sb. statei mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Modern Public Administration: Education, Science, Practice: Collection of Articles of the International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Minsk, 170–174 (in Russian).
  5. Gel’man V., Starodubtsev A. (2016). Opportunities and constraints of authoritarian modernisation: Russian policy reforms in the 2000s. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(1), 97–117. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2015.1113232
  6. Granovetter М. (2009). The strength of weak ties. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya=Journal of Economic Sociology, 10(4), 31–50 (in Russian).
  7. Guba K.S. (2012). Western theory in Saint Petersburg sociology: Between Max Weber and Erwin Hoffman. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 6, 83–97 (in Russian).
  8. Hemerijck A. (2018). Social investment as a policy paradigm. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6), 810–827. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1401111
  9. Jenson J. (2012). Redesigning citizenship regimes after neoliberalism: Moving towards social investment. In: Morel N., Palier B., Palme J. (Eds.). Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol: Policy Press, 61–87. DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781847429247.003.0003
  10. Kabanov Y.A., Chugunov A.V. (2021). Human development, social policy and citizen electronic participation in Russia’s regions. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 19(1), 101–114. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2021-19-1-101-114
  11. Kynev A.V. (2017). Quality of regional political institutions: attempts of measurement. Politicheskaya nauka=Political Science, 4, 259–283 (in Russian).
  12. Lee C.P., Chang K., Berry F.S. (2011). Testing the development and diffusion of e‐government and e‐democracy: A global perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 444–454. DOI: 10.1111/J.1540-6210.2011.02228.X
  13. Mal’tseva D.V. (2017). Setevoi podkhod v sotsiologii: genezis idei i primenenie: monografiya [Network Approach in Sociology: Genesis of Ideas and Application: Monograph]. Novosibirsk: Izd-vo NGTU.
  14. Marx P., Nguyen C.G. (2018). Political participation in European welfare states: Does social investment matter? Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6), 912–943. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1401109
  15. Misuraca G., Pasi G., Urzi Brancati C. (2017). ICT-Enabled Social Innovation: Evidence & Prospective. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2760/494727
  16. Norris P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139164887
  17. Safonova M.A. (2012). Network structure and identities in the local community of sociologists. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya=Sociological Studies, 6, 107–120 (in Russian).
  18. Shore J. (2020). How social policy impacts inequalities in political efficacy. Sociology Compass, 14(5): e12784. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12784
  19. Tavares A.F., Martins J., Lameiras M. (2020). Electronic participation in a comparative perspective: Institutional determinants of performance. In: Rodríguez Bolívar M.P., Cortés Cediel M.E. (Eds.). Digital Government and Achieving E-Public Participation: Emerging Research and Opportunities. Hershey: IGI Global.
  20. Tikhonova N.E. (2006). Resources approach as a new paradigm is stratification studies. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya=Journal of Economic Sociology, 7(3), 11–26 (in Russian).
  21. Truell R., Crompton S. (2019). To the Top of the Cliff. How Social Work Changed with the COVID-19. The International Federation of Social Workers, Switzerland, Rheinfelden.
  22. Wellman B. (1983). Network analysis: Some basic principles. Sociological Theory, 1, 31–33.
  23. Zamaraeva Z.P. (2018). Resursno-potentsial’nyi podkhod v sisteme sotsial’noi zashchity naseleniya Rossii: monografiya [Resource-Potential Approach in the System of Social Protection of Russia’s Population: Monograph]. Moscow: Izdatel’sko-torgovaya korporatsiya “Dashkov i K”.

View full article