VolRC RAS scientific journal (online edition)
29.04.202404.2024с 01.01.2024
Page views
Visitors
* - daily average in the current month
RuEn

Journal section "Socio-demographic research"

Reasons for Postponing Childbirth and Society’s Attitude to Childlessness: Results of In-Depth Interviews with Russian Families

Korolenko A.V., Kalachikova O.N.

Volume 8, Issue 3, 2022

Korolenko A.V., Kalachikova O.N. (2022). Reasons for Postponing Childbirth and Society’s Attitude to Childlessness: Results of In-Depth Interviews with Russian Families. Social area, 8(3). DOI: 10.15838/sa.2022.3.35.2 URL: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/29378?_lang=en

DOI: 10.15838/sa.2022.3.35.2

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Antonov A.I. (2009). Decline in the birth rate, family crisis and the inevitability of depopulation in Europe in the first half of the 21st century (a sociological approach). In: Antonov A.I. (Ed. in ch.). Demographic Research: Collection of articles. M.: KDU, 3–5. (in Russian).
  2. Arkhangel'skii V.N. (2006). Faktory rozhdaemosti [Fertility factors]. М.: TEIS.
  3. Balbo N., Billari F.C., Mills M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie, 29 (1), 1–38.
  4. Balbo N., Billary F., Mills M. (2017). Fertility in advanced societies: a review of research. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, 4(2), 133-195. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v4i2.7107 (in Russian).
  5. Begall K., Mills M. (2011). The impact of perceived work control, job strain and work – family conflict on fertility intentions: A European comparison. European Journal of Population, 27 (4), 433–456.
  6. Begall K., Mills M.C. (2012). The influence of educational field, occupation, and occupational sex segregation on fertility in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 29 (4), 720–742. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcs051
  7. Billari F.C., Philipov D., Testa M. (2009). Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control: Explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria. European Journal of Population, 25 (4), 439–465.
  8. Bremhorst V., Kreyenfeld M., Lambert P. (2019). Nonparametric double additive cure survival models: An application to the estimation of the non-linear effect of age at first parenthood on fertility progression. Statistical Modelling, 19 (3), 248–275. DOI: 10.1177/1471082X18784685
  9. Bühler C., Fratczak E. (2007). Learning from others and receiving support: The impact of personal networks on fertility intentions in Poland. European Societies, 9 (3), 359–382.
  10. Burkhanova F.B., Baimurzina G.R. (2022). Influence of the spouse on reproductive attitudes and motives. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(2), 190–204. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.2.80.12 (in Russian).
  11. Diaz B., Fent T., Prskawetz A., Bernardi L. (2011). Transition to parenthood: The role of social interaction and endogenous networks. Demography, 48 (2), 559–579.
  12. Duprat-Kushtanina V.A., Lutoshkina S.Yu. (2014). Female childlessness and life course scenarios. Mir Rossii=Universe of Russia, 23(2), 183-203. (in Russian).
  13. Freika T., Zakharov S.V. (2014). Fertility trends in Russia during the past half century: period and cohort perspectives. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, 1(1), 106–143. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v1i1.1828 (in Russian).
  14. Goldin C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review, 96 (2), 1–21.
  15. Grigoriev Yu.A., Soboleva S.V. (2013). Reproductive health as a qualitative characteristic of a population. Byulleten' Vostochno-Sibirskogo nauchnogo tsentra Sibirskogo otdeleniya Rossiiskoi akademii meditsinskikh nauk=Bulletin of the East Siberian Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, 3-2 (91), 57–161. (in Russian).
  16. Gudkova, T.B. (2019). Fertility intentions in Russia: motivation and constraints. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, 6(4), 83-103. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v6i4.10428 (in Russian).
  17. Gustafsson S.S. (2005). Having kids later. Economic analyses for industrialized countries. Review of Economics of the Household, 3 (1), 5–16.
  18. Hakim C. (2003). A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: Preference theory. Population and Development Review, 29 (3), 349–374.
  19. Ipatova A.A., Tyndik A.O. (2015). Reproductive age: 30 years old in preferences and biographies. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya=Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology, 24 (4), 123–148. (in Russian).
  20. Isupova O.G. (2017). Assisted reproductive technologies: new opportunities. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, 4(1), 35–64. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v4i1.6987 (in Russian).
  21. Isupova O.G., Rusanova N.E. (2010). Social portrait of reprodictive medicalization patients. SOTsIS=SOCIS, 4, 88–98. (in Russian).
  22. Jacob M., Weiss F. (2010). From higher education to work patterns of labor market entry in Germany and the US. Higher Education, 60 (5), 529–542.
  23. Jones L.E., Schoonbroodt A., Tertilt M. (2011). Fertility theories. Can they explain the negative fertility-income relationship? Demography & The Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 43–100.
  24. Kalachikova O.N. (2012). Regulirovanie reproduktivnogo povedeniya naseleniya: sostoyanie i problemy: preprint [Regulation of the Reproductive Behavior of the Population: Status and Problems: Preprint]. Vologda: ISERT RAN.
  25. Kalachikova O.N., Gruzdeva M.A. (2018). Changes in Reproductive Behavior and Marriage Patterns of the Russian population (Based on Analysis of Rosstat Sample Studies). Sotsial'noe prostranstvo=Social area, 2 (14), DOI: 10.15838/sa.2018.2.14.1 (in Russian).
  26. Keim S., Klarner A., Bernardi L. (2009). Qualifying social influence on fertility intentions: composition, structure, and meaning of fertility-relevant social networks. Current Sociology, 57 (6), 1–20.
  27. Kohler H.P., Rodgers J.L. (2003). Education, fertility, and heritability: Explaining a paradox. In: Wachter K.W., Bulatao R.A. (eds.). Offspring: Fertility behavior in biodemographic perspective. Washington, DC: National Academies press, 46–90.
  28. Kulu H., Boyle P., Andersson G. (2009). High suburban fertility: Evidence from four Northern European countries. Demographic research, 21 (31), 915–944.
  29. Lesthaeghe R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36 (2), 211–251. DOI: 10.2307/25699059
  30. Makarentseva A.O. (2020). Influence of the epidemiological situation on the reproductive intentions of the population. Monitoring ekonomicheskoi situatsii v Rossii. Tendentsii i vyzovy sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya=Monitoring of the economic situation in Russia. Trends and challenges of socio-economic development, 17(119). Available at: https://www.iep.ru/upload/iblock/2f2/3.pdf
  31. Makarentseva A.О. (2022) The dynamics of motherhood entry in modern Russia. Mir Rossii=Universe of Russia, 31(1), 162–182 DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-1-162-182 (in Russian).
  32. Maleva T.M., Tyndik A.O. (2013). Fertility growth potential in Russia: lessons of the megalopolis. Zhurnal novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii=Journal of the New Economic Association. 1 (17), 137–158. (in Russian).
  33. Maleva T.M., Tyndik A.O. (2014). Birth rate growth potential in Moscow. Demoskop Weekly=Demoscope Weekly, 585–586. Available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2014/0585/tema01.php (in Russian).
  34. Mills M. (2004). Stability and change: The structuration of partnership histories in Canada, the Netherlands and the Russian Federation. European Journal of Population, 20, 141–175.
  35. Mills M., Blossfeld H.-P. (2005). Globalization, uncertainty and the early life course: A theoretical framework. In: Blossfeld H.-P., Klijzing E., Mills M., Kurz K. (eds.). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society. London/New York: Routledge advances in sociology serie, 1–24.
  36. Mitrofanova, E. (2020). (No)time to grow up: changing ages of debut biographical events in Russia. Demograficheskoe obozrenie=Demographic Review, 7(4), 36-61. https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v7i4.12043 (in Russian).
  37. Philipov D. (2009). Fertility intentions and outcomes: The role of policies to close the gap. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie, 25 (4), 355–361.
  38. Philipov D., Speder Z., Billari F.C. (2006). Soon, later, or ever? The impact of anomie and social capital on fertility intentions in Bulgaria (2002) and Hungary (2001). Population studies, 60 (3), 289–308.
  39. Rostovskaya T.K., Shabunova A.A., Arkhangelsky V.N. [and others] (2021b). Demograficheskoe samochuvstvie regionov Rossii. Natsional'nyi demograficheskii doklad – 2020 [Demographic well-being of Russian regions. National Demographic Report – 2020]. FNISC RAS. M.: Perspektiva.
  40. Rostovskaya T.K., Vasilyeva E.N., Knyazkova E.A. (2021a). Tools for conducting in-depth interviews to study the intrinsic motivation of reproductive, matrimonial, self-preserving and migratory behavior. Voprosy upravleniya=Management Issues, 1 (68), 103–117. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2021-1-103-117 (in Russian).
  41. Rusanova N.E., Gordeeva V.L. (2016). Assisted reproductive technologies: needs and regulation in low birth rates. Narodonaselenie=Population, 3 (73), 34–46. (in Russian).
  42. Shabunova A.A., Kalachikova O.N. (2009). Reproductive health as a factor in quality of population reproduction. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 3 (7), 73–81. (in Russian).
  43. Sinelnikov A.B. (2018). Family and marriage: Crisis or modernization? Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal=Sociological Journal, 24(1), 95–113. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2018.24.1.5715 (in Russian).
  44. Sinelnikov A.B. (2019). Transformation of marriage and fertility in Russia. Narodonaselenie=Population, 2, 26–39, DOI: 10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00013 (in Russian).
  45. Skhodstvo i razlichie tsennostnykh orientatsii muzhei i zhen po rezul'tatam odnovremennogo oprosa suprugov (2021): koll. monografiya [Similarity and Difference in the Value Orientations of Husbands and Wives According to the Results of a Simultaneous Survey of Spouses (2021): coll. monograph]. Ed. Antonova A.I.. M.: Pero.
  46. Sobotka T. et al. (2011). Postponement and recuperation in cohort fertility: Austria, Germany and Switzerland in a European Context. Comparative Population Studies, 36 (2–3), 417–452. DOI: 10.4232/10.CPoS-2011-10en
  47. Sobotka T., Billari F.C., Kohler H.-P. (2010). The Return of Late Childbearing in Developed Countries: Causes, Trends and Implications. Vienna: Vienna institute of demography.
  48. Sobotka T., Toulemon L. (2008). Overview chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research, 19 (6), 85–138.
  49. Testa M.R. (2006). Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe. Special Eurobarometer. 253/Wave 65.1–TNS Opinion & Social.
  50. Van Bavel J. (2010). Choice of study discipline and the postponement of motherhood in Europe: The impact of expected earnings, gender composition and family attitudes. Demography, 47, 439–458.
  51. Van de Kaa D.J. (1997). Options and sequences: Europe’s demographic patterns. Journal of the Australian Population Association, 14, 1–29.
  52. Zakharov S.V. (2017). Has the potential of structural factors of birth rate growth been exhausted? Part two. Demoskop Weekly=Demoscope Weekly, 733–734. Available at: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2017/0733/tema01.php (in Russian).
  53. Zakharov S.V., Sakevich V.I. (2007). Features of family planning and fertility in Russia: is contraceptive revolution a fait accompli? In: Maleva T.M., Sinyavskaya O.V. (Scientific. ed.). Parents and children, men and women in the family and society. Based on the materials of one study: Collection of analytical articles, Issue 1. M.: NISP, 127–170.(in Russian).
  54. Zakharov S.V., Vishnevsky A.G., Sakevich V.I. (2006). Part 3. Modernization of fertility. In: Vishnevsky A.G. (Ed.) Demographic modernization of Russia, 1900–2000. М.: Novoe izd-vo, 149–254. (in Russian).
  55. Zemlyanova E.V. (2016). Loss of potential childbirths in Russia due to health problems. Sotsial'nye aspekty zdorov'ya naseleniya=Social aspects of public health, 2 (48). DOI: 10.21045/2071-5021-2016-48-2-4 (in Russian).
  56. Zemlyanova E.V., Chumarina V.Zh. (2018). Postponement of childbearing by Russian women in modern socio-economic conditions. Sotsial'nye aspekty zdorov'ya naseleniya=Social aspects of public health, 64(6). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2018-64-6-9. Available at: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/1031/30/lang,ru (in Russian).
  57. Zhuk E.I. (2016). Reproductive installations of Muscovites of young and middle age. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny=Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes, 1, 156–174. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2016.1.06 (in Russian).
  58. Zhuravleva T.L., Gavrilova Ya.A. (2017). Analysis of fertility factors in Russia: what do the HSE RLMS data say? Ekonomicheskii zhurnal Vsh=EHSE Economic Journal, 21(1), 145–187. (in Russian).

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article