VolRC RAS scientific journal (online edition)

Journal section "Socio-economic research"

The Quality of Megalopolis Environment as an Element of Living Standards: Assessment of Territorial Differentiation

Bagirova A.P., Notman O.V.

Volume 7, Issue 4, 2021

Bagirova А.P., Notman О.V. The Quality of Megalopolis Environment as an Element of Living Standards: Assessment of Territorial Differentiation. Social area, 2021, vol. 7, no. 4. DOI: 10.15838/sa.2021.4.31.7 URL: http://socialarea-journal.ru/article/29071?_lang=en

DOI: 10.15838/sa.2021.4.31.7

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Gehl J. Goroda dlya lyudei [Cities for People]. Moscow: Al’pina publisher, 2012. 276 p.
  2. Gehl J., Gemzoe L. Novye gorodskie prostranstva [New City Spaces]. Moscow: Kontsern “KROST”, 2012. 263 p.
  3. Ballas D. What Makes a “Happy City”? Cities, 2013, vol. 32 (SI), pp. 39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.009
  4. Kabisch S., Koch, F., Gawel E. et al. Urban Transformations: Sustainable Urban Development through Resource Efficiency, Quality of Life and Resilience. Dordrecht: Springer, 2018. 384 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59324-1
  5. Grifoni R.C., Donofrio R., Sargolini M. Quality of Life in Urban landscapes: In Search of a Decision Support System. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2018. 399 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65581-9
  6. Vicuna M., Orellana A., Truffello R., Moreno D. Urban integration and quality of urban life: Dilemmas in metropolitan contexts. Revista INVI, 2019, vol. 34, issue 97, pp. 17–47.
  7. Salihoglu T., Turkoglu H. Residential environment and quality of urban life. Megaron, 2019, vol. 14, supp. 1, pp. 203–217. DOI: 10.5505/MEGARON.2018.06977
  8. Vysokovskii A. (Ed.). Bor’ba za gorozhanina: chelovecheskii potentsial i gorodskaya sreda [The Struggle for the Citizen: Human Potential and Urban Environment]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola urbanistiki NIU VShE; IV Moskovskii urbanisticheskii forum, 2014. 102 p.
  9. Puzanov К.А. Gorodskaya sreda i kul’turnoe prostranstvo megapolisa: sravnitel'noe issledovanie sotsial'nykh bar'erov gorodskogo razvitiya [Urban Environment and the Cultural Space of Megapolis: A Comparative Study of Social Barriers of Urban Development]. Moscow: FGBOU VPO “RANKhiGS pri Prezidente RF”, 2015. 75 p.
  10. Zupan D., Gunko M. The comfortable city model: Researching Russian urban planning and design through policy mobilities. Urban Studies and Practices, 2019, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 7–22. DOI: 10.17323/usp4320197-22
  11. Golubeva Ya.A. et al. Renovation outside Moscow: Searching for alternative ways of development in post-soviet cities. Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki=Urban Studies and Practices, 2019, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 104–128. DOI: 10.17323/usp422019104-128 (in Russian).
  12. Ovsyannikova T.Yu., Preobrazhenskaya M.N. Index approach to evaluating the quality of life of a population and the level of development of an urban area. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika=Tomsk State University Journal of Economics, 2014, no. 1 (25), pp. 30–46 (in Russian).
  13. Engel’gardt A.E., Lipovka A.Yu., Fedchenko I.G. International experience of indexation of the quality of urban environment. Urbanistika=Urban Studies, 2018, no. 4, pp. 77–87 (in Russian).
  14. Rykun A.Yu. et al. Measuring the quality of life in urban areas: The feasibility of using the index approach. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki=The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 2020, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 283–298. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2020-18-2-283-298 (in Russian).
  15. Jabareen Y.R. Sustainable urban forms: Their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2006, vol. 26, issue 1, pp. 38–52. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X05285119
  16. Compact City Policies: A Comparative Assessment. OECD Publishing, 2012. 284 р.
  17. Korotkova E. et al. Upravlenie prostranstvenno-ekonomicheskim razvitiem goroda: skrytye resursy [Managing the Spatial and Economic Development of the City: Hidden Resources]. Moscow: Tsentr gorodskikh issledovanii biznes-shkoly “Skolkovo”, 2016. 212 p.
  18. DeLisle J.R., Grissom T.V. An empirical study of the efficacy of mixed-use development: The Seattle experience. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 2013, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 25–57.
  19. Nabil N.A., Eldayem G.E.A. Influence of mixed land-use on realizing the social capital. HBRC Journal, 2014, vol. 52, issue 2, pp. 285–298.
  20. Da Silva D.С., King D.A., Lemar S. Accessibility in practice: 20-minute city as a sustainability planning goal. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, issue 1, art. 129. DOI: 10.3390/su12010129
  21. Moreno C., Allam Z., Chabaud D. et al. Introducing the “15-minute city”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities, 2021, issue 4, pp. 93–111. DOI: 10.3390/smartcities4010006
  22. Marquet O., Miralles-Guasch C. The walkable city and the importance of the proximity environments for Barcelona’s Everyday Mobility. Cities, 2015, vol. 42, pp. 258–266. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.012